Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es1041892 →Countries where authors are citing Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant
This map shows the geographic impact of Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant
This network shows the impact of Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant.
About Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant
This paper, published in 2011, received 633 indexed citations . Written by Rälf Kaegi, Andreas Voegelin, Brian Sinnet, S. Zuleeg, Harald Hagendorfer, Michael Burkhardt and Hansruedi Siegrist covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (546 citations), Biomedical Engineering (216 citations) and Pollution (204 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es1041892.