CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy
- Authors
- Glen P. PetersEdgar G. Hertwich
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es072023k →Countries where authors are citing CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy
This map shows the geographic impact of CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy
This network shows the impact of CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy.
About CO2Embodied in International Trade with Implications for Global Climate Policy
This paper, published in 2008, received 994 indexed citations . Written by Glen P. Peters and Edgar G. Hertwich covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Engineering (852 citations), Economics and Econometrics (709 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (312 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es072023k.