Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es062828c →Countries where authors are citing Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions
This map shows the geographic impact of Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions
This network shows the impact of Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions.
About Degradation of Well Cement by CO2 under Geologic Sequestration Conditions
This paper, published in 2007, received 482 indexed citations . Written by Barbara Kutchko, Brian Strazisar, David A. Dzombak, Gregory V. Lowry and N. Thaulow covering the research area of Civil and Structural Engineering, Ocean Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ocean Engineering (412 citations), Environmental Engineering (314 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (224 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es062828c.