Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es061817g →Countries where authors are citing Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase
This map shows the geographic impact of Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase
This network shows the impact of Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase.
About Natural Organic Matter Stabilizes Carbon Nanotubes in the Aqueous Phase
This paper, published in 2006, received 660 indexed citations . Written by Hoon Hyung, John D. Fortner, Joseph B. Hughes and Jae‐Hong Kim covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (506 citations), Biomedical Engineering (315 citations) and Pollution (157 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es061817g.