Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es0617441 →Countries where authors are citing Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?
This map shows the geographic impact of Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?
This network shows the impact of Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?.
About Haloacetonitriles vs. Regulated Haloacetic Acids: Are Nitrogen-Containing DBPs More Toxic?
This paper, published in 2006, received 623 indexed citations . Written by Mark G. Muellner, Elizabeth D. Wagner, Susan D. Richardson and Michael J. Plewa covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (578 citations), Environmental Chemistry (196 citations) and Water Science and Technology (168 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es0617441.