Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es061349a →Countries where authors are citing Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions
This map shows the geographic impact of Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions
This network shows the impact of Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions.
About Aggregation and Sedimentation of Aqueous Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron Dispersions
This paper, published in 2006, received 888 indexed citations . Written by Tanapon Phenrat, Navid B. Saleh, Robert D. Tilton and Gregory V. Lowry covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (730 citations), Water Science and Technology (254 citations) and Materials Chemistry (254 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es061349a.