Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/es060413l →Countries where authors are citing Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado
This map shows the geographic impact of Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado
This network shows the impact of Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado.
About Antibiotic Resistance Genes as Emerging Contaminants: Studies in Northern Colorado
This paper, published in 2006, received 1.5k indexed citations . Written by Amy Pruden, Ruoting Pei, Heather Storteboom and Kenneth H. Carlson covering the research area of Pollution, Ecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Pollution (1.3k citations), Molecular Medicine (659 citations) and Molecular Biology (296 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es060413l.