Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 740 indexed citations. Written by Samuel N. Luoma and Philip S. Rainbow covering the research area of Pollution, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Water Science and Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (621 citations), Pollution (483 citations) and Ecology (96 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.

Countries where authors are citing Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Why Is Metal Bioaccumulation So Variable? Biodynamics as a Unifying Concept.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es048947e.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026