System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 814 indexed citations. Written by Sangwon Suh, Manfred Lenzen, Graham Treloar, Hiroki HONDO, Arpad Horvath, Gjalt Huppes, Olivier Jolliet, Wolfram Krewitt, Yuichi Moriguchi and Jesper Munksgaard covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Environmental Engineering (673 citations), Building and Construction (180 citations) and Strategy and Management (139 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.

Countries where authors are citing System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches more than expected).

Fields of papers citing System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es0263745.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026