Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment

716 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2001, received 716 indexed citations. Written by Daniel W. Elliott and Wei‐xian Zhang covering the research area of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (520 citations), Organic Chemistry (222 citations) and Materials Chemistry (202 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.

Countries where authors are citing Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Field Assessment of Nanoscale Bimetallic Particles for Groundwater Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es0108584.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026