Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 610 indexed citations. Written by David A. Reckhow, Philip C. Singer and Ronald L. Malcolm covering the research area of Environmental Chemistry, Ecology and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (501 citations), Water Science and Technology (206 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (179 citations). Published in Environmental Science & Technology.

Countries where authors are citing Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/es00081a005.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026