Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 749 indexed citations. Written by M PACHECO and Christopher L. Marshall covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Process Chemistry and Technology and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Process Chemistry and Technology (521 citations), Biomedical Engineering (300 citations) and Organic Chemistry (210 citations). Published in Energy & Fuels.

Countries where authors are citing Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Review of Dimethyl Carbonate (DMC) Manufacture and Its Characteristics as a Fuel Additive.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ef9600974.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026