Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques
- Journal
- Energy & Fuels
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ef300735t →Countries where authors are citing Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques
This map shows the geographic impact of Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques
This network shows the impact of Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques.
About Porosity of Coal and Shale: Insights from Gas Adsorption and SANS/USANS Techniques
This paper, published in 2012, received 459 indexed citations . Written by María Mastalerz, Lilin He, Yuri B. Melnichenko and John A. Rupp covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Ocean Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanics of Materials (426 citations), Ocean Engineering (339 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (110 citations). Published in Energy & Fuels.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ef300735t.