Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?

363 indexed citations
published 2013

Countries where authors are citing Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?.

About Describing Noncovalent Interactions beyond the Common Approximations: How Accurate Is the “Gold Standard,” CCSD(T) at the Complete Basis Set Limit?

This paper, published in 2013, received 363 indexed citations . Written by Jan Řezáč and Pavel Hobza covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (266 citations), Materials Chemistry (125 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (117 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ct400057w.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026