Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ct200602x →Countries where authors are citing Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction
This map shows the geographic impact of Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction
This network shows the impact of Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction.
About Comprehensive Benchmarking of a Density-Dependent Dispersion Correction
This paper, published in 2011, received 400 indexed citations . Written by Stephan N. Steinmann and Clémence Corminbœuf covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (207 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (126 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (78 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ct200602x.