Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models
- Authors
- R. Bruce Martin
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr960037v →Countries where authors are citing Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models
This map shows the geographic impact of Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models
This network shows the impact of Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models.
About Comparisons of Indefinite Self-Association Models
This paper, published in 1996, received 529 indexed citations . Written by R. Bruce Martin covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (276 citations), Biomaterials (225 citations) and Materials Chemistry (219 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr960037v.