New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.9k indexed citations. Written by Hisataka Kobayashi, Mikako Ogawa, Raphael Alford, Peter L. Choyke and Yasuteru Urano covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Biophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (1.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (663 citations) and Spectroscopy (627 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging more than expected).

Fields of papers citing New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New Strategies for Fluorescent Probe Design in Medical Diagnostic Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr900263j.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026