Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 557 indexed citations. Written by Martin A. M. Gijs, Frédéric Lacharme and Ulrike Lehmann covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (446 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (160 citations) and Molecular Biology (88 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Microfluidic Applications of Magnetic Particles for Biological Analysis and Catalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr9001929.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026