Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr500177a →Countries where authors are citing Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices
This network shows the impact of Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices.
About Nanowire Electrodes for Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices
This paper, published in 2014, received 635 indexed citations . Written by Liqiang Mai, Xiaocong Tian, Xu Xu, Liang Chang and Lin Xu covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (535 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (380 citations) and Materials Chemistry (136 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr500177a.