Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr5000915 →Countries where authors are citing Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors
This map shows the geographic impact of Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors
This network shows the impact of Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors.
About Insertion-Type Electrodes for Nonaqueous Li-Ion Capacitors
This paper, published in 2014, received 650 indexed citations . Written by Vanchiappan Aravindan, Joe Gnanaraj, Yun‐Sung Lee and Madhavi Srinivasan covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (598 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (574 citations) and Automotive Engineering (86 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr5000915.