Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr400020d →Countries where authors are citing Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives
This network shows the impact of Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives.
About Nanoscaled Metal Borides and Phosphides: Recent Developments and Perspectives
This paper, published in 2013, received 930 indexed citations . Written by Sophie Carenco, David Portehault, Cédric Boissière, Nicolas Mézailles and Clément Sánchez covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (543 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (445 citations) and Materials Chemistry (419 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr400020d.