Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine

616 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2013, received 616 indexed citations. Written by Hongying Mao, Sophie Laurent, Wei Chen, Omid Akhavan, Mohammad Imani, Ali Akbar Ashkarran and Morteza Mahmoudi covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (459 citations), Materials Chemistry (419 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (108 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Graphene: Promises, Facts, Opportunities, and Challenges in Nanomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr300335p.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026