Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr300222d →Countries where authors are citing Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science
This map shows the geographic impact of Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science
This network shows the impact of Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science.
About Cation−π Interaction: Its Role and Relevance in Chemistry, Biology, and Material Science
This paper, published in 2012, received 960 indexed citations . Written by A. Subha Mahadevi and G. Narahari Sastry covering the research area of Spectroscopy, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (298 citations), Organic Chemistry (286 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (243 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr300222d.