Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr300213b →Countries where authors are citing Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges
This network shows the impact of Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges.
About Nanomaterials for Theranostics: Recent Advances and Future Challenges
This paper, published in 2014, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Eun‐Kyung Lim, Soonmyung Paik, Seungjoo Haam, Yong‐Min Huh and Kwangyeol Lee covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (692 citations), Materials Chemistry (441 citations) and Biomaterials (418 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr300213b.