Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis

2.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 2.7k indexed citations. Written by Minyoung Yoon, Renganathan Srirambalaji and Kimoon Kim covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (2.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (1.6k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (801 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr2003147.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026