Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr2002646 →Countries where authors are citing Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group
This map shows the geographic impact of Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group
This network shows the impact of Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group.
About Review on Modern Advances of Chemical Methods for the Introduction of a Phosphonic Acid Group
This paper, published in 2011, received 485 indexed citations . Written by Charles S. Demmer, Niels Krogsgaard‐Larsen and Lennart Bunch covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (447 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (121 citations) and Molecular Biology (44 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr2002646.