Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr2002239 →Countries where authors are citing Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
This map shows the geographic impact of Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
This network shows the impact of Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations.
About Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
This paper, published in 2012, received 528 indexed citations . Written by Trygve Helgaker, Sonia Coriani, Poul Jørgensen, Kasper Kristensen, Jeppe Olsen and Kenneth Ruud covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (353 citations), Spectroscopy (220 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (115 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr2002239.