Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Biomedical Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr200061k →Countries where authors are citing Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures
This map shows the geographic impact of Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures
This network shows the impact of Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures.
About Plasmons in Strongly Coupled Metallic Nanostructures
This paper, published in 2011, received 2.6k indexed citations . Written by Naomi J. Halas, Surbhi Lal, Wei‐Shun Chang, Stephan Link and Peter Nordlander covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.0k citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.7k citations) and Materials Chemistry (823 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr200061k.