Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 672 indexed citations. Written by M. Scholz and Evamarie Hey‐Hawkins covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (621 citations), Organic Chemistry (272 citations) and Materials Chemistry (185 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Carbaboranes as Pharmacophores: Properties, Synthesis, and Application Strategies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr200038x.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026