Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr200002f →Countries where authors are citing Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning
This map shows the geographic impact of Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning
This network shows the impact of Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning.
About Chemistry of Diglycolamides: Promising Extractants for Actinide Partitioning
This paper, published in 2011, received 550 indexed citations . Written by Seraj A. Ansari, Priyanath Pathak, Prasanta K. Mohapatra and V. Κ. Manchanda covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (530 citations), Mechanical Engineering (267 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (264 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr200002f.