Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr1003503 →Countries where authors are citing Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes
This map shows the geographic impact of Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes
This network shows the impact of Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes.
About Dehydrogenation and Related Reactions Catalyzed by Iridium Pincer Complexes
This paper, published in 2011, received 889 indexed citations . Written by Jongwook Choi, Amy H. Roy MacArthur, Maurice Brookhart and Alan S. Goldman covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (729 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (609 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (224 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr1003503.