Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr040409x →Countries where authors are citing Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
This map shows the geographic impact of Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
This network shows the impact of Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?.
About Principles of Protein−Protein Interactions: What are the Preferred Ways For Proteins To Interact?
This paper, published in 2008, received 517 indexed citations . Written by Özlem Keskin, Attila Gürsoy, Buyong Ma and Ruth Nussinov covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Computational Theory and Mathematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (429 citations), Materials Chemistry (109 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (98 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr040409x.