Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr030697h →Countries where authors are citing Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds
This map shows the geographic impact of Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds
This network shows the impact of Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds.
About Mechanochemistry: The Mechanical Activation of Covalent Bonds
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Martin K. Beyer and Hauke Clausen‐Schaumann covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (432 citations), Materials Chemistry (391 citations) and Organic Chemistry (210 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr030697h.