Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
- Authors
- Kang Xu
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr030203g →Countries where authors are citing Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
This map shows the geographic impact of Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
This network shows the impact of Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries.
About Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
This paper, published in 2004, received 6.3k indexed citations . Written by Kang Xu covering the research area of Automotive Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (5.8k citations), Automotive Engineering (3.4k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (661 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr030203g.