Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 495 indexed citations. Written by Erik T. J. Nibbering and Thomas Elsaesser covering the research area of Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (386 citations), Spectroscopy (188 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (175 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ultrafast Vibrational Dynamics of Hydrogen Bonds in the Condensed Phase.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr020694p.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026