Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr0206059 →Countries where authors are citing Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin
This map shows the geographic impact of Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin
This network shows the impact of Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin.
About Functional Analogues of Cytochrome c Oxidase, Myoglobin, and Hemoglobin
This paper, published in 2003, received 575 indexed citations . Written by James P. Collman, Roman Boulatov, Christopher J. Sunderland and Lei Fu covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (286 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (234 citations) and Molecular Biology (182 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr0206059.