Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.3k indexed citations. Written by George W. Gokel, W. Matthew Leevy and Michelle E. Weber covering the research area of Bioengineering, Electrochemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (695 citations), Organic Chemistry (592 citations) and Materials Chemistry (534 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.

Countries where authors are citing Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Crown Ethers:  Sensors for Ions and Molecular Scaffolds for Materials and Biological Models.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr020080k.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026