Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions
- Authors
- Tamio HayashiKaori Yamasaki
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr020022z →Countries where authors are citing Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions
This map shows the geographic impact of Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions
This network shows the impact of Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions.
About Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions
This paper, published in 2003, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Tamio Hayashi and Kaori Yamasaki covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (1.2k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (565 citations) and Molecular Biology (169 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr020022z.