Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr010421e →Countries where authors are citing Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions
This map shows the geographic impact of Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions
This network shows the impact of Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions.
About Fluorogenic and Chromogenic Chemosensors and Reagents for Anions
This paper, published in 2003, received 2.9k indexed citations . Written by Ramón Martínez‐Máñez and Félix Sancenón covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (2.6k citations), Materials Chemistry (2.1k citations) and Bioengineering (804 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr010421e.