Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation
- Journal
- Chemical Reviews
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cr000666b →Countries where authors are citing Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation
This map shows the geographic impact of Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation
This network shows the impact of Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation.
About Non-Metathesis Ruthenium-Catalyzed C−C Bond Formation
This paper, published in 2001, received 721 indexed citations . Written by Barry M. Trost, F. Dean Toste and Anthony B. Pinkerton covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (689 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (238 citations) and Molecular Biology (51 citations). Published in Chemical Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cr000666b.