Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm990080+ →Countries where authors are citing Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness
This map shows the geographic impact of Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness
This network shows the impact of Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness.
About Single-Crystal Colloidal Multilayers of Controlled Thickness
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Peng Jiang, Jane F. Bertone, Kao‐Shing Hwang and Vicki L. Colvin covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.4k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (709 citations) and Materials Chemistry (682 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm990080+.