Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm504550e →Countries where authors are citing Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects
This map shows the geographic impact of Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects
This network shows the impact of Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects.
About Thermally Conductive Graphene-Polymer Composites: Size, Percolation, and Synergy Effects
This paper, published in 2015, received 518 indexed citations . Written by Michael Shtein, Roey Nadiv, Matat Buzaglo, Keren Kahil and Oren Regev covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (428 citations), Biomedical Engineering (134 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (106 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm504550e.