Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm500641a →Countries where authors are citing Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films
This map shows the geographic impact of Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films
This network shows the impact of Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films.
About Transparent Conductive Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide Epitaxial Thin Films
This paper, published in 2014, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Joseph Halim, Maria R. Lukatskaya, Kevin M. Cook, Jun Lu, Cole Smith, Lars‐Åke Näslund, Steven J. May, Lars Hultman, Yury Gogotsi and Per Eklund covering the research area of Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (1.3k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (609 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (306 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm500641a.