New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm200441h →Countries where authors are citing New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
This map shows the geographic impact of New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
This network shows the impact of New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries.
About New Anode Framework for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
This paper, published in 2011, received 398 indexed citations . Written by Jiantao Han, Yun-Hui Huang and John B. Goodenough covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (388 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (165 citations) and Materials Chemistry (112 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm200441h.