Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm0343047 →Countries where authors are citing Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite
This map shows the geographic impact of Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite
This network shows the impact of Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite.
About Biopolymer−Clay Nanocomposites Based on Chitosan Intercalated in Montmorillonite
This paper, published in 2003, received 558 indexed citations . Written by Margarita Darder, Montserrat Colilla and Eduardo Ruiz‐Hitzky covering the research area of Bioengineering, Polymers and Plastics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (297 citations), Polymers and Plastics (199 citations) and Materials Chemistry (137 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm0343047.