Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Journal
- Chemistry of Materials
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/cm020100z →Countries where authors are citing Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals
This map shows the geographic impact of Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals
This network shows the impact of Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals.
About Optical Properties of Inverse Opal Photonic Crystals
This paper, published in 2002, received 474 indexed citations . Written by Rick C. Schroden, Mohammed A. Al-Daous, Christopher F. Blanford and Andreas Stein covering the research area of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (323 citations), Materials Chemistry (199 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (154 citations). Published in Chemistry of Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/cm020100z.