ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 3.1k indexed citations. Written by John J. Irwin and Brian K. Shoichet covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (2.0k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (1.7k citations) and Organic Chemistry (428 citations). Published in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling.

Countries where authors are citing ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ZINC − A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ci049714+.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026