The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications
- Journal
- Biomacromolecules
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/bm060620d →Countries where authors are citing The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications
This map shows the geographic impact of The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications
This network shows the impact of The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications.
About The Future Prospects of Microbial Cellulose in Biomedical Applications
This paper, published in 2006, received 883 indexed citations . Written by Wojciech Czaja, David James Young, Marek Kawecki and R. Malcolm Brown covering the research area of Rehabilitation and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (700 citations), Biomedical Engineering (268 citations) and Plant Science (127 citations). Published in Biomacromolecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/bm060620d.