The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 914 indexed citations. Written by Kenneth A. Johnson and Roger S. Goody covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (458 citations), Biomedical Engineering (109 citations) and Materials Chemistry (98 citations). Published in Biochemistry.

Countries where authors are citing The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Original Michaelis Constant: Translation of the 1913 Michaelis–Menten Paper.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/bi201284u.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026