Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements
- Journal
- Biochemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/bi050736e →Countries where authors are citing Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements
This map shows the geographic impact of Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements
This network shows the impact of Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements.
About Coupled Folding and Binding with α-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements
This paper, published in 2005, received 521 indexed citations . Written by Christopher J. Oldfield, Yugong Cheng, Marc S. Cortese, Pedro Romero, Vladimir N. Uversky and A. Keith Dunker covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (441 citations), Materials Chemistry (160 citations) and Cell Biology (69 citations). Published in Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/bi050736e.